How to design a bidirectional composite | Question of the Week | Should I become a post-doctoral researcher?


Hello Reader,

Happy new week. I hope you are had a relaxing weekend. Here is a quick reflection of some computational modelling issues, as well as a new addition to the CM Videos Insider newsletter. Here are the issues considered in this edition of the newsletter:

  1. Technical Reflection: How to design a BD composite.
  2. Question of the Week: Choice of RVE Size.
  3. Scholarly tip of the week: Post-doctoral research.

Technical Reflections

How to design a Bidirectional Composite in ABAQUS

Although there are a lot of materials of micromechanical modelling of unidirectional composites, there is really not a lot of materials when considering bidirectional and multidirectional/angle ply composites. The route for their modelling is often a laminated approach where you use the Classical Laminate Theory to model individual plies and based on that extract the behaviour of the composite material.

Why many prefer the laminate approach to BD composites modelling: I often wonder why there is not a lot of the micromechanical modelling of these composites. I think there are many reasons prime of which is the need for generating the ABD matrix for composite materials. The ABD matrix is an assembly of material properties of a homogenized composites that relates the forces and moments to the nominal strains, shear strains and curvatures of the composite as shown below.

The ABD matrix is very important as it tells the story of a multi-directional and situational behaviour of the composite, not just the uniaxial and shear ones but also curvature effects. If the laminate stacking sequence is asymmetrical which leads to the evolution of bending moments within the structure, then with an ABD-matrix, clearly specified, then one can also account for curvature effects seen during the manufacture of laminated composites. It is this particular advantage that makes composite modellers steer more in the laminate approach that the micromechanical approach I suggests here.

So, when will a micromechanical approach work? Of course, if you want to track the macroscale behaviour of a composite by passing information of its behaviour from the microscale, then the micromechanical approach is particularly important. Also, it is possible to generate a homogenized ABD-matrix for such composites even with this micromechanical approach and you can find more information about it in this paper:

Gao, J., Chen, W., Yu, B., Fan, P., Zhao, B., Hu, J., Zhang, D., Fang, G. and Peng, F., 2019. A multi-scale method for predicting ABD stiffness matrix of single-ply weave-reinforced composite. Composite Structures, 230, p.111478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111478

The micromechanical approach: If you however are interested in the RVE modelling of bidirectional composite, you will have to follow similar approach as you would do for a unidirectional composite. This will involve (a) design of the virtual domain which is representative of the bulk (b) choice and set up of appropriate boundary conditions to capture the holistic micromechanics of the BD composites (c) numerical analysis of the structure inside a finite element scheme and (d) post-processing of the constitutive behaviour using an applicable homogenization scheme (typically computational homogenization).

In a recent video I published on the CM Videos YouTube channel, I showed how to achieve the first task above which is effortless design of a microscale representation of a BD composite. I have assumed an ordered distribution of the fibres within the matrix. If you want to watch this first video, then visit the link below. Future videos will try to explore how to setup the model, create the boundary conditions and post-process a homogenized stress-strain behaviour of the BD composite. Please let me know in a reply to this email what you think of this procedure.

video preview

Question of the Week

Choice of RVE Size

This section called Question of the Week is a new addition/feature to my newsletters. I often answer quite a lot on some really interesting questions on the YouTube channel and this is something I think readers of this newsletter can also benefit from. In this maiden edition, I am going to discuss about the influence of choice of RVE size to many micromechanical studies. I will report the questions and produce the answer I gave on the channel and conclude by providing further reflections on the question and my answer.

Question:

Please tell what is the general criteria here to set the size of an RVE. Earlier we know that how much volume fraction we have to [keep] and [the] fibre diameter , but how [should one] select the size of rve?
Can you please elaborate this?
- Question posted by @AnuragGupta-op7uz in the comments section of this video:

Answer:

Hello @AnuragGupta-op7uz, thanks for this query. You are right in asserting that volume fraction and fibre diameter are model parameters that are independent of a chosen boundary condition. What we can change is certainly the size of the RVE.
I have dealt with this question for a UD composite in this video: https://youtu.be/2NFZ69zdSMM
I have also published an article about this here: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.12.036 in which I showed that for a UD composite, a good RVE size should be about a fibre size of six times the fibre diameter. This is about 90-micrometre for a 15-micrometre fibre diameter. I think this can be extrapolated to work for a BD composite considering that the building block of a BD composite - at the lowest level - is a lamina made up of fibres distributed within a matrix medium.
However, it will be worthwhile to assess this fact numerically and determine whether that RVE size of six times the fibre diameter applies for a BD composite. It can be a little study that one can investigate too. I hope this explanation makes sense.

Further reflections

The key take-away from the above is that the size of the RVE is certainly a factor in micromechanical studies. It is known for UD composites that this is about six-times the size of the inclusions (of uniform diameter). For a BD composite, or other heterogeneous media with multiple inclusion types, this is unknown and should be an interesting study for someone who might want to explore this.


Scholarly tip of the week

Should I do post-doctoral research work after PhD?

I know some of the readers of this newsletter are currently undertaking a PhD study. Some are at the early stages of their study whilst some are about to finish. One thing most of you might be considering is what to do after your study? What does the landscape look like post-graduation and what choices do you need to make. In particular, how does my future look like in view of a post-doctoral researcher?

Who is a post-doctoral researcher? Before we go on to answer the questions, I will like to provide a definition of who a post-doctoral researcher is?

Post-doctoral researcher simply refers to someone who is conducting professional research work following completion of a PhD. They are often employed and earn their living by doing research. They would usually be employed on a specific project, with a line management of a Principal Investigator (or at times secure funding applications themselves and therefore conducts and leads their research). They can be called research fellow, postdoc and would most of the time be holding temporary academic position usually from one to four years.

Should I go on to do a post-doctoral research work: The answer to that question lies in three possible scenarios:

Non-academic career: If you elect after the PhD to go and work in non-academic careers, then it might not be ideal to seek a post-doctoral position. Usually, within the industry, there are specific qualifications and certifications that you need to get to move up the career ladder. Also, experience with the operations of the organisation would be more useful than securing further research degrees. Of course you might have to still do research, but due to the need for non-disclosure agreements (NDAs), such research work will have to be done within the company.
Academic career: If you want to pursue an academic career and that is to become a lecturer, professor, researcher, or even research institute fellow, then a post-doctoral research work will be recommended. A PhD is good as it shows your potentials to do research and helps you gain the analytical thinking required in undertaking research. In that respect, you should take up any opportunities to do post-doctoral research work. Also, it gives you the opportunity to work on different projects which will widen the range of possible research that you can undertake when you officially take up the academic role. In my case, working as a post-doc on impact behaviour of composites for three years, gave me insights into this type of research especially considering that my PhD was about the finite deformation of UD composites. When I took up academic role in a university, ideas for projects I went on to do, and research on were from such research.
Location of your PhD work: Whilst what I describe above applies mainly within UK and Europe, I know that the PhD experience in different parts of the world is very variable. Some countries (say US and Germany) will often have longer PhDs unlike the 3 years of UK. These students have much indepth research exposure which might mean they are sufficiently qualified for an academic role after PhDs than most UK PhD graduates. Also, the expectation to publish might be different in some countries and that can drive such students to seek further research around their topic which can only help in the long run. Therefore, where you did your PhD might influence if you truly need to go on to do a post-doctoral research work.

The above is my reflection or scholarly tip to help you as you explore what you want to do after your PhDs. Please let me know in a reply if you agree with these advise and if there is any comments you might want to give to me.


That is it for this week. I hope you have enjoyed reading the newsletter. Let us catch up again next week and take care.

Thank you for reading this newsletter.

If you have any comment about my reflections this week, please do email me in a reply to this message and I will be so glad to hear from you.

If you know anyone who would benefit from reading these reflections, please do share with them. If there is any topic you want me to explore making a video about, then please do let me know by clicking on the link below. I wish you a wonderful week and I will catch up with you in the next newsletter.

Lets keep creating effective computational modelling solutions.

Michael


Connect with me on: Twitter | LinkedIn | Instagram | Tiktok| Mailing List

Other Links


Welcome to new subscribers: If you are one of the new faces joining the CM Videos Insider Group, then welcome. I am pleased you are here and please do click the link below to see and hopefully read previous newsletter articles from me. Thank you.